Except for free from toxic cosmetics is the best you can make your skin and your health and the environment. Enhance your beauty by products plant based cosmetic mineral and organic cosmetics are the new way to promote long-term health. There is no reason why they should continue to use the toxic cosmetics.
The majority of cosmetics on the market is made up of chemicals that are banned in other countries. This is due to our Government, which provides cosmetic manufacturers carte blanche to do rampant use these harmful chemicals incomprehensible approach. This scheme, although explained in this article that are addressed in detail separately in another article. The first thing we need to do is to discover how you can help protect our skin and general well-being from the harmful effects of these toxic cosmetics.
New research has shown that exposure to toxic chemicals that increase the devastation with our hormones can increase the risk of breast cancer. This is especially true for adolescents, and pregnant when they expose themselves to these active ingredients in cosmetic products. Europe has made great strides in regulating cosmetics. The European Union (EU) is passed an amendment to the cosmetics directive ", the law which governs the cosmetics in all 15 EU countries. It would prohibit any chemicals that were suspected to cause cancer or much, birth defects or genetic mutation from use in cosmetic products. Hundreds of chemicals (over 1,100) was forbidden.
Some American cosmetic companies responded by saying, "American women are not as concerned about cosmetics that Europeans." How dare they decide for one has! A large cosmetic firms had a genuine disconnection and replied to a written request for use of Pthalates (pronounced tha-lates and just a fancy word for aroma and see more than 79% of all cosmetic products), says "United States has the most secure products that our laws allow for both the consumer and the environment". But in Korea, the same company, in response to similar consumer concerns, acted in a slightly different way when "women's Committee of the Korean Federation of environmental movements" tested 24 products for a toxic ingredient known as Pthalates. One hundred percent of the products tested had Pthalates. Ninety-six percent had more than two Pthalates. Fifty per cent had more than three and eight percent had four different types. Now that the same companies that responded to the U.S. investigation says what they used was safe, now in the Republic of Korea responded this way. "Our company uses not DEHP and DBP (Pthalates), which has raised concern that parts of our products." The deleted thereafter all Pthalates from their products.
Another large company took a position in the United States, but when challenged in the United Kingdom, said this: "we agree with the Women's Environmental Network position on the intrinsic toxicological potential Pthalates. We take a precautionary approach and will only want to use a component if it is safe and approved for use in cosmetic products. As a consequence of this approach, there is already a programme to remove Pthalates from our products. "
In April 2004, it was a March on the Capitol to the organisers claimed was the largest of its kind. More than a million people in the March for women's lives and it became the launching pad for an organization called the campaign for safe cosmetics. Campaign message promotes toxic-free cosmetics. It promised to replace hazardous chemicals contained in cosmetic products with safer alternatives within three years. To achieve this bath the cosmetic manufacturer in the United States to do four things:
1. remove the European Union banned chemicals, all products are sold throughout the world.
2. an inventory of all products for chemical concerns.
3. develop a plan to replace hazardous chemicals with safer alternatives within three years.
4. report its progress in public.
Within a few months, a small number of companies signing compact for safe cosmetics. In 2007, had some three years later over 500 companies have signed the Compact. Valid for 90 of these companies were from outside the United States. All signers, however, was already natural product companies and, above all, not even a larger American cosmetic company was in the list. The Reason? US cosmetic industry is the most unregulated industry under the auspices of the FDA. How is determined the FDA of a cosmetic product is safe, we might ask? The answer is no. It leaves the security up to the individual companies themselves. In other words, if the company believes its product cosmetic are safe, it is on the market.
2007 Drove the campaign for safe cosmetics, a full page ad in the United States today. The ad read "to put on Makeup should not be playing with matches" and showed a little girl lipstick smeared on his face. Three major cosmetic companies were named in the advertisement. Within three months, all three cosmetic companies remove the EU banned chemicals from their lipstick and produced what essentially was a toxic-free product.
Let us be clear here. That example represents only one product in a schedule of cosmetic products that run in the hundreds per cosmetic companies. So even if this was a major step forward, it is just a small step in the things with the ultimate mission is to get all the cosmetic companies to reformulate their lines to the new standards for free from toxic ingredients of all products in safe, healthy, free from toxic cosmetics for all major systems.
Everyone can help to move this very important process of shopping for and buying only certified organic health products. To do so must seek certification logos for all cosmetic products which they buy. These logos are displayed prominently alongside logos for no animal testing, biodegradable, etc.
AJ Spicoli has over 35 years of experience in the cosmetic. His http://www.organicskincareanswers.com site has detailed, documented information about the content of this article, and much more ... read more about toxic-free cosmetic products is a 10 day free mini-course available on the site.